Footy Show Pikes
August 29th 2008 02:21
Well, there we were, all keyed up, and nothing happened. For a month or more rumours have been circulating that a former or retiring AFL player was on the brink of coming out. Everything was in place, Kevin Sheedy and Jason Akermanis had done their ‘John the Baptist’ number, preparing the way, and a lucrative payout had been agreed with the producers of the Footy Show for the exclusive story.
And then . . . nothing. Last night the Footy Show failed to deliver. Instead it was the usual moronic drivel.
More rumours are now running. The player is worried about cruelling his media career. Or he’s concerned at the backlash because he coaches a junior footy team. Or he just plain got cold feet.
Whatever the reason, the breakthrough can’t be long in coming. According to Pippa Grange, General Manager of People, Psychology and Culture at the AFL Players Association, the issue is being widely discussed within the sport.
She has canvassed a number of players as to how they would react if one of their teammates came out, and their response was to say that they were focused on other things, like their footballing ability, and not concerned who they slept with.
I asked if a player had ever come out to her and asked for assistance, she replied, “No-one on the current list.” When she was asked what about former players, she replied, “I’m not giving you that.”
That would tally with the off-the-record comments of one club chairman, who said that the exiting policies for handling such issues at his club ‘had worked well in the past.’
Now however you slice the pie, there have to be at least a few gay players on the current list – even at a very conservative estimate at least 30 who are same-sex attracted to some degree – so it’s telling that no current player has approached Ms Grange, the one person in the players association whose job is to handle psychological and relationship issues, such as the pressure of being a closeted gay footballer.
She said that she could understand why no-one had come out. Not because of the homophobia in the sport, which she reckons is less than popularly supposed, but simply because of the intense media scrutiny of every aspect of players private lives. Who would want to bring that on themselves?
And yet – I reckon there would also be lots of benefits to coming out while at the top of your game. Most fans would say, “So what if he’s a pouf? He kicked ten goals for us last week!” Most players would react similarly. Yes, there would be intense media scrutiny, but there would also be immense sponsorship opportunities for a savvy business manager, and it could only enhance the prospects of a post-footy media career.
I reckon the key point here is that the AFL has to act, as they have over racism, and over the treatment of women. They have to be upfront about cultivating an acceptance and celebration of sexual diversity in football. Some of those players who told Pippa Grange they didn’t care who a bloke sleeps with so long as he can play footy, should be encouraged to become poster-boys for a diversity initiative.
After all, diversity is normal – people are not all the same. And all kinds of people can benefit from participation in what is supposed to be ‘our national game.’
Now for a bit of mischief! We know for sure that there’s at least one footy player contemplating coming our. Naturally, everyone has their own idea of who it might be.
These pictures are a selection of the most popular names being bandied around. Don’t assume that any of them are actually gay, or bisexual. But don’t assume they’re all heterosexual, either.
Who would YOU add to the list?
| 56 |
| Vote |
subscribe to this blog






























Comment by Anonymous
Was it not a coincidence that the rumour appeared a day or two after Matthew Mitcham made such a splash!!
Seriously though, it's going to take a while before a current player on the AFL list has the courage to come out...
We may want it sooner but it just going to have to wait!
Comment by Doug Pollard
Current Affairs
Rainbow Reporter
Comment by Anonymous
I think posting their images with this information is damaging enough. If someone wrote a piece like you have and added my image to it I would consider the option to sue.
Comment by Anonymous
It is not up to you to suggest such things and potentially wreck someone's career/life.
Comment by Doug Pollard
Current Affairs
Rainbow Reporter
Comment by Anonymous
There is NO such thing as "merely reports", you are still defaming the names of those who may wish their sexuality to remain private.
Names should NEVER be mentioned, perhaps clubs or something more general but not so specific as names and images.
And well, you said it yourself, you should never assume anyone's sexuality so..........why on earth are you bothering making such a point of something that was meant to occur but didn't? IF people's sexuality isn't such a big deal, that is?
And if your answer is because it is news-worthy, well, you are proving my point that it IS defamatory to name names in such an industry as it is more than likely to be damaging rather than anything else.
Comment by Anonymous
There is NO such thing as "merely reports", you are still defaming the names of those who may wish their sexuality to remain private.
Names should NEVER be mentioned, perhaps clubs or something more general but not so specific as names and images.
And well, you said it yourself, you should never assume anyone's sexuality so..........why on earth are you bothering making such a point of something that was meant to occur but didn't? IF people's sexuality isn't such a big deal, that is?
And if your answer is because it is news-worthy, well, you are proving my point that it IS defamatory to name names in such an industry as it is more than likely to be damaging rather than anything else.