God Hits the Switch
June 16th 2008 03:39
The years of America hiding its light under a Bush’ll soon be over, and either McCain or Obama will take the oath. And Hallalujah, it looks as if God’s gonna be a winner either way.
We’ve gotten used to the idea that right wing = evangelical, but with Barack Obama in the game, it ain’t necessarily so.
It seems the Almighty is hitting the switch and going on the down low, politically speaking. Enter stage left a group called Matthew 25.
Now there’s a fair bit in chapter 25 of the Gospel according to Matthew. I looked it up.
There’s the parable of the wise and foolish virgins – that’s all about not sharing your oil and keeping it all to yourself.
Then there’s the parable of the talents – that’s about speculating to accumulate, and more being given to those who already have, and everything being taken away from those who have nothing.
Are these guys a bunch of closet Republicans or something?
No, turns out these Matthew 25 folks mean the last bit of the chapter – the Judgment of the Nations, the bit where Jesus says:
“Come, you that are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world; for I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, I was naked and you gave me clothing, I was sick and you took care of me, I was in prison and you visited me.”
The idea is to remind Christians that social justice was a major part of Christ’s agenda. The most important part.
In fact – though they may have forgotten it – for those who actually read the Bible, you’ll notice the only major difference between true Communism and true Christianity is the absence of God (not that either philosophy has ever been put into practice).
Jesus told us not to heap up treasures on earth. He told people to give it all away and follow him. He told them to rely on God to provide. Look after the sick, the old. Welcome the outcasts. Love the sinners. Do not judge others – you might not be able to see it, but you’re probably just as bad yourself.
Jesus did not tell us to set ourselves up as slick tele-evangelists, conning credit card numbers out of the gullible, having sleazy assignations in motels, driving around in Rolls-Royces and dining with Presidents.
In other words, there’s more reason for a true Christian to vote Obama, not McCain. At least, that’s the idea. Matthew 25 will talk to church groups about Bama's faith and about the Christian message of social justice.
And since a hell of a lot of evangelicals don’t trust McCain further than they could throw him, Obama could be on a winner here. He could get God to vote Democrat for a change.
Hallelujah!
We’ve gotten used to the idea that right wing = evangelical, but with Barack Obama in the game, it ain’t necessarily so.
It seems the Almighty is hitting the switch and going on the down low, politically speaking. Enter stage left a group called Matthew 25.
Now there’s a fair bit in chapter 25 of the Gospel according to Matthew. I looked it up.
There’s the parable of the wise and foolish virgins – that’s all about not sharing your oil and keeping it all to yourself.
Then there’s the parable of the talents – that’s about speculating to accumulate, and more being given to those who already have, and everything being taken away from those who have nothing.
Are these guys a bunch of closet Republicans or something?
No, turns out these Matthew 25 folks mean the last bit of the chapter – the Judgment of the Nations, the bit where Jesus says:
“Come, you that are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world; for I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, I was naked and you gave me clothing, I was sick and you took care of me, I was in prison and you visited me.”
The idea is to remind Christians that social justice was a major part of Christ’s agenda. The most important part.
In fact – though they may have forgotten it – for those who actually read the Bible, you’ll notice the only major difference between true Communism and true Christianity is the absence of God (not that either philosophy has ever been put into practice).
Jesus told us not to heap up treasures on earth. He told people to give it all away and follow him. He told them to rely on God to provide. Look after the sick, the old. Welcome the outcasts. Love the sinners. Do not judge others – you might not be able to see it, but you’re probably just as bad yourself.
Jesus did not tell us to set ourselves up as slick tele-evangelists, conning credit card numbers out of the gullible, having sleazy assignations in motels, driving around in Rolls-Royces and dining with Presidents.
In other words, there’s more reason for a true Christian to vote Obama, not McCain. At least, that’s the idea. Matthew 25 will talk to church groups about Bama's faith and about the Christian message of social justice.
And since a hell of a lot of evangelicals don’t trust McCain further than they could throw him, Obama could be on a winner here. He could get God to vote Democrat for a change.
Hallelujah!
| 140 |
| Vote |
subscribe to this blog

















Comment by S.L.
The Political Brief
No matter which of the candidates gets elected, it won't bode well for the USA. This time it seems like we just can't win, no matter who we vote for... Maybe next time (in 2012) there will be someone who can do the job and do it well.
Comment by The Roderick Post
1. He did not attend a racist church. That's an ignorant statement.
2. John McCain's Friends are criminals and thieves.
3. Cindy McCain's was drug addict
3. Black people can't be racist
I am sick and tired of scared white people trying to make up excuses as to why they don't want Obama to be President. At least be honest with yourself. You believe like most people believe that who ever is in the white house is going to do things for people who look the most like them. Oh and maybe there was something to that old move Birth of a Nation. Gimme a break people.
Comment by S.L.
The Political Brief
Rev, Jeremiah Wright used the term "white" in an insulting fashion repeatedly on film on the pulpit. He lied about white people doing damage to black people. He said "God Damn America". The Catholic priest who spoke on the same pulpit, made very clearly racist remarks against Hillary Clinton (of all people) and how horrified she was to find that Obama was black. If you have listened to any of the Wright sermons, you can't miss the blatant anti-American, anti-white racism.
Name a few of McCains criminal friends. Obama is a friend of Mr. Ayers (a famous terrorist who brags that he didn't do enough damage). How about the slum lord who was recently put on trial for criminal behavior? I can't recall his name right now, but he's quite famous and engaged in some shady dealings with Obama. Or maybe the Palestinian terrorist leaders who have met with Obama's representatives? I'm sure they're just nice, misunderstood people, right?
What office is Cindy McCain running for? If we aren't supposed to notice the way Michelle Obama behaves now, why should Cindy McCains past (whatever it might have been) be an issue?
And who says black people can't be racist? How about Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton and Louis Farrakhan? They're proud to be racists. And they prove it every time they open their mouths.
One final note. I never said what race I am. I wouldn't vote for Barack Obama under any circumstances because his politics (such as they are) are both stupid and dangerous. My first choice for president is Alan Keyes. Like I said to begin with TRP, you're an expert on ignorance.
Comment by theroderickpost
Obama sat on board with Ayers, he wasn't going to the kids birthday parties. Cindy McCain campaigns for her husband so her actions are relevant. Why don't you look up the Keating Scandal and learn about his affiliation with criminals..including his own wife.
I have listened to Wright sermons and while fiery, they point out truths, that America has had a history of oppressing people of color. SL..you indeed need to pick up a dictionary and a history book.
Comment by S.L.
The Political Brief
Building a future on long past complaints is ridiculous. It only prevents people from making any progress on their own. Harping on things that happened generations ago accomplishes nothing but feeding fires of hatred that should have turned to ashes. If that doesn't bother you, then enjoy it. Revel in it. Just don't expect anyone with common sense to agree with you.
Comment by Tiffeany Roderick
If you had common sense SL you would not vote for four more years of GWB. Your sending our country down in flames with that nonsense.
Comment by S.L.
The Political Brief
My great grandparents didn't have anything to do with me, personally. The fact that they were slaves is sad, but they were freed, in case you hadn't heard. I also have great grandparents who were Cherokee, but I don't need to go on the "warpath" to celebrate my heritage. And I didn't ask for Affirmative Action to help me cheat in school. I pay my taxes and not always very happily, because I resent the way some people think that their heritage is to waste their lives while moaning about the past. Funny, isn't it, how the loudest of those whiners, call themselves "progressive?"
Comment by theroderickpost
Comment by S.L.
The Political Brief
Comment by theroderickpost
Comment by Doug Pollard
Current Affairs
Rainbow Reporter
He said that because the process is so expensive, it could hardly be called democratic, because of what the candidates had to do to get the nomination.
Or to put it succinctly - "every four years the Americans get to choose between a crook and an idiot" - a crook because he's fought his way there, an idiot because he's a puppet for hidden interests.
No prizes or guess which category Big Dubbya fits!
Comment by S.L.
The Political Brief
I assume, Doug, you're referring to the fact that some people don't think Pres. Bush is as smart as Al Gore or John Kerry, right? Did you know that he has an MBA and graduated from Harvard and Yale with higher GPA's than either of the other two? If you want to get a close look at a puppet for "other interests" I suggest you pay attention to Barack Obama. How else could an inexperienced, unknown, first-term Senator wind up as the Democrat candidate? It sure isn't his sterling voting record. He can't give answers "off the cuff" and he trips over his tongue every time he speaks. Oh, he also doesn't know how many states there are in the United States.
Comment by theroderickpost
Comment by S.L.
The Political Brief
Comment by theroderickpost
John McCain does not care about women's rights or equal pay for women. He didn't even bother to show for the vote for equal pay for women. I could never vote for a man like that for President. Women need progress not reversals of landmark Supreme Court decisions retracting women's rights.
Comment by S.L.
The Political Brief
Remember, when you listed your objections to what I said (feel free to go back and check it, since your thought process is obviously not working) on the second number 3, you said that black people can't be racist. And now you accuse me of being racist. Well, genius, which is it? Or have you still not managed to read what I said?
Comment by theroderickpost
Back to the subject at hand you didn't mention Obama's grades because they were stellar.
I've made errors in the post because I am really trying to dumb down to your level to make sure that you understand.
Of and for there Record I have a B.S in Business Management and Market and an MBA with an emphasis in international business.
I've lived all around the world and I've seen the likes of you. You obviously don't get out much and you're not enlightened. Regardless Obama will be our next President, like it or not so you may as well start getting used to the idea. What did you study? Haterism 101?
Comment by No Borders Migration Advocates 1
No Borders Guide
That is racist. I don't care what colour or religion people are, it makes no difference. But I have to say it, some (and like every race driven talk I mean only some) black people are the most racist. They blame everything on racism, any bad comment towards them or rejection they see it as racist. Blaming racism is a form of racism. How many times have you heard a person with dark skin who doesn't get their way call a person with light coloured skin a racist. (given sometimes it is racism but not all the time).
For racism to go away it needs black people to help by stop blaming their situation on a racist act (unless it really is, and you know when it is and when its not)
Comment by theroderickpost
Comment by S.L.
The Political Brief
As for "prejudice" that's also real. It means (literally) to "pre-judge" just like theroderickpost has pre-judged me and made all the wrong assumptions. That's another sad form of ignorance and racism.
Comment by theroderickpost
This sounds a little like something another Minister which has been mentioned in this post.
Dr. King was a peacemaker, but make no mistake, he understood the mental chains and institutionalized racism which was prevalent then and still exists today.
Comment by S.L.
The Political Brief
Comment by theroderickpost
I am not making this up.
It was you who brought up Martin Luther King, not me. I am just pointing out facts to you since you obviously have a very little grasp on history.
Comment by S.L.
The Political Brief
I mentioned that my great grandparents were slaves. What do you suppose that means? Do you think maybe they were Swedish slaves? I also mentioned that my other great grandparents were Cherokee (that's Native American, since you apparently didn't know). As for my not knowing much about history, I've lived a great deal of it.
Thank you for calling me a Slow Learner, ignoramus, etc. It displays your ignorance and prejudice to a "T." It makes you look so very, very smart to accuse a black person of racism after saying that black people can't be racist!
Maybe I should call Al Sharpton and have him ream you for your foolishness? Nah, why bother, I'm sure he's busy with another Tawana Brawley "incident" to prove that black people can't be racist.
Comment by Tiffeany Roderick
Comment by S.L.
The Political Brief
Comment by theroderickpost
Comment by S.L.
The Political Brief
I'm through wasting time on you.
Comment by No Borders Migration Advocates 1
No Borders Guide
I feel for any race that coped abuse and degregation because of the colour of their skin or the god they followed butit's no excuse. They should lead by example, be the bigger person, attempt to educate the people making the racist remarks (when they are actually racists remarks).
message here is there is no excuse for racism, oppressed or not, period.
Comment by theroderickpost
Comment by theroderickpost
Comment by No Borders Migration Advocates 1
No Borders Guide
Yes pointing out racist remarks isn't racist (although it doesn't help the matter) I agree.
I am just disappointed when people blame misfortunes on racism straight away without even considering that 'not getting the job' or being kick out of a pub' was because of them 'not being the best person for the job' or being too drunk'.
I believe that both parties (races) need to work on their behaviour in order to cease racism for good.
Comment by troderickpost
Comment by Lilla
From The Home Front
Enviro Warrior
Dream Herald
Esoteric Bookshop
I just wanted to say, well written piece ... I REALLY enjoyed the read.
Well said.
Lilla ...
Comment by Doug Pollard
Current Affairs
Rainbow Reporter
Comment by No Borders Migration Advocates 1
No Borders Guide
By the way, what if your white roderick. If you are white and have experienced racism are you more sensitive to it as well.