Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Rainbow Reporter - News, Current Affairs & Commentary from GLBTIQ to U with Doug Pollard

Doug Pollard's Rainbow Report airs Thursday 1900-2000hrs AEST Joy 94.9 FM Melbourne Australia, streaming worldwide and via the Joy iPhone app, available free from iTunes. Follow The Rainbow Reporter on Facebook and @rainbowreporter on Twitter. He also edits The Stirrer You will find Doug from time to time on the Drum, Crikey, and wherever else he can earn a crust. But wherever you find him, the opinions belong to him and not to the platform he's standing on.

Tackling footy phobias

May 22nd 2010 04:48
footy player kiss

Thanks to Jason Akermanis confused unguarded comments, the debate on homosexuality in sport is now beginning to drag some truths into the sunlight.

As he pointed out, if you sequester a group of fit young men in close intimacy – in prison, the armed forces, or a footy team - then a strongly homoerotic situation results.

Many men who would not otherwise express the homosexual component of their nature begin displaying homoerotic behaviours.

Team training, in sport or the military, deliberately exploits this. Extremely fit young men, at the peak of their sexual drive, sleep, eat, shower and train together, frequently naked or near-naked, and in close physical contact.

This is bolstered by, for example, providing communal showers, baths and change rooms instead of private facilities, encouraging players to leave their families and live with team mates, and so on.

Physical and emotional dependence on each other is promoted and encouraged: you do it for your mates.

A strongly homoerotic culture results. It's called "male bonding". But its real name is love. It's a team-building system was invented by the Greeks. We just took the sex out of it.

At the same time trainers strenuously suppress any sexual expression of this erotic arousal, which creates a high level of frustration, which in turn fuels aggression - which is then available to be channelled against opponents.

Of course, it sometimes spills out in late night drunken brawls.

This is why sports teams often sledge their opponents by calling them "poofters", "girls", etc. They are saying ‘you are weak because you succumbed to the homoerotic milieu in which we all live and work; we, however, being ‘stronger’, did not’.

Clearly, this is a dangerous strategy: it can lead to players forcing sex on one other. A documentary about a straight amateur rugby club in the UK a couple of years back showed exactly that: after the weekly player assessments, the least competent member of the team was expected, as part of the regular Friday night drinking ritual, to give the team captain a blowjob in public.

As a former member of a rugby club, I can vouch for the fact that this particular club is not unusual.

This is why group sex with a woman or women is so often a part of team culture. The men can have sex with one another, without compromising their heterosexual self-image, interpolating a female body as a ‘voltage convertor’. To the men, the woman is not really a person. No wonder she ends up feeling used.

Small wonder, then, that Akermanis feels discomfort playing and showering with an openly gay team-mate. It’s his unconscious recognition that this old ultra-sexist (which he calls ‘hyper-masculine’) sporting culture, which depends – as he has pointed out – on the lie that everyone is 100% straight, cannot accommodate an openly gay man.

But the answer, Jason, is not to tell gay players to stay in the closet, not to force all team members to pretend to fit an artificial norm. The answer is to celebrate their diversity.

And that would really change the game.
Add To: Digg Furl StumbleUpon Yahoo

subscribe to this blog 



1 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Spring-Heeled Jack

May 23rd 2010 01:58
An interesting take on it. I have only one small amendment to make, and that's in regard to your comment regarding the ancient Greeks. While it's certainly true that intense male bonding was encouraged (to the point of being an institution) in some of the Greek city-states, actual sexual union between men of equal status was still very much taboo. The reason for this is that the model of sexual interaction in their society was based on a polarity between active and passive, empowered and disempowered, rather than the gender divide between male and female, which we are used to.

As such, for two citizen men to have sex, one of them would have to assume the submissive role, which ran contrary to all the social ideals concerning his potency. The only acceptable avenues for same-sex union were thus either with slaves (who were thought of as property anyway), or between an older and a younger citizen male (lover and beloved) with a strong emphasis on mentor-ship beyond sex itself.

There are notable exceptions, however, such as the Spartans and the Sacred Band of Thebes, and its interesting to note that both were renowned as elite fighting units. Ancient mores were able to make an exception, it seems, for men whose dominance and potency were exhibited beyond doubt in other arenas. Perhaps a relevant point for the topic at hand...?

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(required for reply notification)
More Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
3 Posts
398 Posts dating from June 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Doug Pollard's Blogs

21467 Vote(s)
225 Comment(s)
372 Post(s)
Moderated by Doug Pollard
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]