Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login
 
The Rainbow Reporters new show, Freshly Doug, broadcasts live every Thursday 9-noon AEST in Melbourne Australia on 94.9 FM, streaming via the web at joy.org.au.

A Gay Marriage

July 7th 2008 03:10
As I’ve gotten older, I’ve tended to ignore my own birthday, but this year I decided I would have a little celebration. Nothing fancy, just a buffet lunch on Sunday afternoon with a few of the people who matter to me. I could have invited at least a dozen more, but it’s a while since we’ve entertained and I didn’t want to take too much on.

My partner was initially angry because I sent out the invites without telling him my plans, but he came round. It saved a lot of arguments! As I’ve learned from dealing with editors and program managers, it’s better to do it first and apologise after, if necessary, than to spend hours in fruitless argument.


He swung into efficiency mode, took a day off work, and we spent two days spiffing up the house. It needed a spring-clean anyway and this was a great motivator - ordinarily we both hate housework.

Then we shopped and cooked. And cooked! We love to cook. Beef rendang, Sri Lankan channa dal, Ethiopian lentil salad, tabbouleh, falafel, pullao rice, garlic naan bread, fruit salad, key lime pie (with our own limes) and cherry cake. With cream. Are you salivating now?

My beloved partner turned into the perfect butler for the day. “Stay out of the kitchen, entertain your guests and leave everything to me,” he said, serving food and drinks, making coffee and even clearing away – mostly – afterwards.

I think it was the best birthday present he could have given me.

Everyone loved the food and the conversation flowed, and I thought “how lucky I am, to have such great people as friends, and how especially blessed I am to have such a wonderful husband.”

Sixteen years we’ve been together, which sounds like a lot, but why oh why didn’t we meet when we were younger?


One of these days – hopefully before too long – I hope to make an honest man of him in the quiet little church where he is parish treasurer and churchwarden.

Now that WOULD be a great birthday present!!

I won't write his name, because he isn't out to his employer. The last time he came out at work, he was fired for cause on trumped-up charges and it costs us time, money and a stressful court-case to retrieve his reputation and entitlements, and a lot more time before he worked his way back to a senior job again. But we got through it, together.

This country is not as accepting as it pretends, and the anti-discrimination laws are feeble and hard to enforce, despite what you read in the press.

Well, that's a snapshot from my same-sex marriage. As you can see, not so different from any other kind.

It's not a legal marriage, yet, as it could be in Spain, Canada, or Holland, among other places. And it won't be "equal" even if the current government gets its planned changes to the law through parliament. Please don't be fooled by the spin. Same-sex couples will still be subject to apartheid-type laws that will leave us unequal and unfairly treated.

After a day of great joy, back to reality and back to the BS shovelled over us daily by the bigoted God Squads and their mates in the tabloids.

A sour note to end on, but that's how it is.
69
Vote
   


Gays & Muslims Marriage Alliance?

June 26th 2008 02:55
polygamy
Polygamy is suddenly all over the Australian media. Where did that suddenly come from?

Keysar Trad, president of the Islamic Friendship Association, backed calls by Sheik Khalil Chami of the Islamic Welfare Centre, for polygamous relationships to be recognized in Australia.

Sheik Chami said there was nothing wrong with having a number of marriages. "You allow the lesbians, you allow the gays - why not these people? What's wrong with it?" he said.

Well actually we don’t allow the lesbians and the gays – we still can’t get married. In fact, the most recent attempt to address our inequality was blocked by the Liberal/National opposition (I should explain that our Liberals are not liberal, in fact, they are more like Tories or Republicans, which is to say, feral).

A bill to give same-sex couples equal treatment in retirement benefits was delayed at least until September, when a whole raft of other equality legislation will also be up for scrutiny.

Fundamentalist Christians and Muslims have been in lockstep in their opposition to same-sex marriage so far. Could this be a crack in the wall?

Now we suddenly have Christians and Muslims at loggerheads over the definition of marriage in our multicultural society.

Because one of the reasons Christians always give for opposing same-sex marriage is that it will lead to polygamy, polyandry (one wife / many husbands), group marriage and so forth.

Could this be an opportunity for the gay community to make common cause with the Muslim community against the Christians, for general reform of the marriage laws?

Sheerest fantasy, of course. I can’t see Muslims supporting same-sex marriage any time soon, and I can’t see gay communities supporting polygamy – at least, not in public. But at the same time, given the way many gay and bisexual relationships are structured in reality, I can’t see why not.

And it does neatly expose the limits of mutliculturalism. "We're not really a multicultural society in that sense," said James Jupp, of the Australian National University. "We privilege one culture, the Western Christian culture, over all others."
65
Vote
   


Tasmania, devil
Tasmanian devil - he bites!

The devil's in the details, as Tasmania moves to legalise same-sex marriage.

One of the rather trite aphorisms that run through “Lord of The Rings” is “Evil will may evil mar” – or, to put it less floridly, actions undertaken with bad intent may in practice contribute to good outcomes.

One such example seems to be the mean-spirited pandering to religious extremists indulged in by John Howard and the late coalition government. In order to keep these somewhat odiferous individuals onside - and if you think I’m being unkind, don’t forget they include Johns good buddies the Exclusive Brethren, who prefer not to educate their women, make them wear headscarves and walk three paces behind them, ban newspapers, computers and television, forbid all their members to vote, and don’t allow their children to go to university, and the Australian Christian Lobby, who knowingly spread inaccurate and discredited propaganda about gays and lesbians – the late and unlamented government amended the Marriage Act to define marriage as a union between one man and one woman.

They meant to make it difficult, if not impossible, for Australian gays and lesbians to ever get married. In fact, they may have achieved the opposite.

That’s because of the way the Australian constitution works. It contains a list of things that only Canberra can legislate about – but marriage isn’t one of them. Until 1961 Australians were married under state law: after that, marriage was regulated under the federal Marriage Act – not the constitution.

So long as the Marriage Act didn’t specify what marriage actually was, then all possible marriages, same or opposite sex, were a federal matter.

Then Howard changed the Marriage Act to define marriage as heterosexual only. A state law legalizing same-sex marriage would not now conflict with federal law.

Constitutional expert Professor George Williams explains.

“Until 2004, it was arguable that the federal marriage law was so broad that it covered the field with regard to marriage so as to leave no room at all for state or territory laws.

“However, amendments that year by the Howard government made it absolutely clear that Commonwealth law should be taken only to extend to marriage for people of different sexes and not at all to same-sex partnerships. It now provides that ‘marriage means the union of a man and a woman to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for life’.

“By setting out so clearly the only type of marriage to fall under federal law, the change ironically created an opening for state and territory laws on other forms of marriage.

“It will be interesting to see if any state takes the opportunity to legislate not just for civil unions with public ceremonies, but same-sex marriage. The Federal Government would not have the easy option of vetoing such a law.”

Tasmania may be about to test the Professor’s theory, with the issue of this statement by the Green Party.

The Tasmanian Greens have announced an intention to table legislation to provide for same-sex marriage in Tasmania when the House of Assembly resumes on July 1st.

Greens Deputy Leader Nick McKim MP said that the Same Sex Marriage Bill 2008 is based on values like respect and tolerance, which he said most Tasmanians would share.

“If we are fair dinkum about removing discrimination we should give all Tasmanians access to the fundamental institutions of our society, including marriage,” Mr McKim said.

“There is no such thing as ‘mostly equal’, and until legislators provide same-sex couples with access to all civil institutions we will continue to discriminate against large numbers of people who deserve much better.”

“Recent progress on same-sex marriage in places like California has shown that there is nothing to fear and everything to be gained by this kind of progressive initiative.”

“Most Tasmanians share the values of tolerance and respect on which this legislation is based.”


“This legislation would grant rights not currently enjoyed by couples registered under Tasmania’s very good Relationships Act 2004, including equal rights to adopt.”


The Bill will probably fail, but the hope is that before it does, there will be a full parliamentary enquiry into the issue which may establish whether Professor Williams is right or not.
64
Vote
   


Doug Pollard's Blogs

9796 Vote(s)
115 Comment(s)
142 Post(s)
Moderated by Doug Pollard
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]