Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login
 
The Rainbow Reporters new show, Freshly Doug, broadcasts live every Thursday 9-noon AEST in Melbourne Australia on 94.9 FM, streaming via the web at joy.org.au.

A Whole of Government Initiative

August 23rd 2009 07:32
Social Inclusion Board
The Social Inclusion Board

The Rudd government is big on ‘Social Inclusion’. There’s a Minister (Julia Gillard), a Parliamentary Secretary (Ursula Stephens), a Board, a Task Force, and a Social Inclusion Unit in almost every ministry. It’s a ‘whole of government’ priority.


I only had a vague idea of what Social Inclusion actually was, but my curiosity was aroused following Stephens party turn at that highly exclusionary Holy Brekkie in Canberra. So I Googled.

There are many definitions, but Vic Health says: “A socially inclusive society is … one where all people feel valued, their differences are respected, and their basic needs are met so they can live in dignity. Social exclusion is the process of being shut out from the social, economic, political and cultural systems which contribute to the integration of a person into the community (Cappo 2002).”

The federal government defines some ‘indicators’ of social exclusion: poverty, unemployment, homelessness, youth, age, mental illness, physical disability, limited or no support networks, family breakdown/disfunction, and membership of a minority.

Well, we’re a minority, so that’s one box ticked. Here’s some more (some of these stats come from overseas, because the research simply hasn’t been done here, but they broadly agree with the experience of professionals here).


USA: gay and lesbian youth are two to three times more likely to commit suicide and 30% of all youth suicides are related to the issue of sexual identity.

Australia: 25% to 40% of young lesbians and gays have attempted suicide.

USA: 28% of gay and lesbian high school students dropped out of school because of harassment.

Australia: between a quarter and a third of all homeless young people are same sex attracted.

USA: 26% of gays and lesbian youth are forced to leave home because of conflicts with their families over their sexual identities.

UK: A 2008 poll found 6% of Britons define themselves as homosexual or bisexual, 13% have had some same sex experience.

US: Best available data indicates 4-6% have regular ongoing same-sex experience.

The conclusion is inescapable. GLBTIQ people – especially the young – undeniably suffer social exclusion. And with all those Ministers, Boards, Task Forces and Units, the government is clearly hot on Social Inclusion. So how much of this massive ‘whole of government’ effort is directed at our community?

None. Nada. Zip. Zero.

Of the 14 members of the Social Inclusion Board, 4 are expert in indigenous issues, 3 (including the vice-chairman, the deputy Archbishop of Adelaide) front Catholic charities, 2 represent ethnic minorities, the rest are health experts, and one is Eddie McGuire. It’s a similar story with the Social Inclusion Taskforce.

I don’t want to get into a numbers game, but I can’t resist pointing out that indigenous people represent around 2.5% of the Australian population (according to the last census), while we number at least 4%. And the indigenous community also gets a Minister for Aborginal Affairs and a Minister for Indigenous Health.

No-one for one moment begrudges the first Australians one iota of this effort. But even if GLBTIQ were only 1% of the population, there would still be no excuse for excluding us from the very mechanism designed to ensure everyone enjoys “full participation in Australian society”.

Ursula Stephens says, “Labor has adopted social inclusion as an objective and organising principle of the nation's social and economic policy.” And excluded us from it.

It seems like the governments commitment to GLBTIQ inequality extends beyond the simple issue of relationship recognition: it’s a ‘whole of government’ initiative.
65
Vote
   


A Gay Marriage

July 7th 2008 03:10
As I’ve gotten older, I’ve tended to ignore my own birthday, but this year I decided I would have a little celebration. Nothing fancy, just a buffet lunch on Sunday afternoon with a few of the people who matter to me. I could have invited at least a dozen more, but it’s a while since we’ve entertained and I didn’t want to take too much on.

My partner was initially angry because I sent out the invites without telling him my plans, but he came round. It saved a lot of arguments! As I’ve learned from dealing with editors and program managers, it’s better to do it first and apologise after, if necessary, than to spend hours in fruitless argument.

He swung into efficiency mode, took a day off work, and we spent two days spiffing up the house. It needed a spring-clean anyway and this was a great motivator - ordinarily we both hate housework.

Then we shopped and cooked. And cooked! We love to cook. Beef rendang, Sri Lankan channa dal, Ethiopian lentil salad, tabbouleh, falafel, pullao rice, garlic naan bread, fruit salad, key lime pie (with our own limes) and cherry cake. With cream. Are you salivating now?

My beloved partner turned into the perfect butler for the day. “Stay out of the kitchen, entertain your guests and leave everything to me,” he said, serving food and drinks, making coffee and even clearing away – mostly – afterwards.

I think it was the best birthday present he could have given me.

Everyone loved the food and the conversation flowed, and I thought “how lucky I am, to have such great people as friends, and how especially blessed I am to have such a wonderful husband.”

Sixteen years we’ve been together, which sounds like a lot, but why oh why didn’t we meet when we were younger?

One of these days – hopefully before too long – I hope to make an honest man of him in the quiet little church where he is parish treasurer and churchwarden.

Now that WOULD be a great birthday present!!

I won't write his name, because he isn't out to his employer. The last time he came out at work, he was fired for cause on trumped-up charges and it costs us time, money and a stressful court-case to retrieve his reputation and entitlements, and a lot more time before he worked his way back to a senior job again. But we got through it, together.

This country is not as accepting as it pretends, and the anti-discrimination laws are feeble and hard to enforce, despite what you read in the press.

Well, that's a snapshot from my same-sex marriage. As you can see, not so different from any other kind.

It's not a legal marriage, yet, as it could be in Spain, Canada, or Holland, among other places. And it won't be "equal" even if the current government gets its planned changes to the law through parliament. Please don't be fooled by the spin. Same-sex couples will still be subject to apartheid-type laws that will leave us unequal and unfairly treated.

After a day of great joy, back to reality and back to the BS shovelled over us daily by the bigoted God Squads and their mates in the tabloids.

A sour note to end on, but that's how it is.
69
Vote
   


Gays & Muslims Marriage Alliance?

June 26th 2008 02:55
polygamy
Polygamy is suddenly all over the Australian media. Where did that suddenly come from?

Keysar Trad, president of the Islamic Friendship Association, backed calls by Sheik Khalil Chami of the Islamic Welfare Centre, for polygamous relationships to be recognized in Australia.

Sheik Chami said there was nothing wrong with having a number of marriages. "You allow the lesbians, you allow the gays - why not these people? What's wrong with it?" he said.

Well actually we don’t allow the lesbians and the gays – we still can’t get married. In fact, the most recent attempt to address our inequality was blocked by the Liberal/National opposition (I should explain that our Liberals are not liberal, in fact, they are more like Tories or Republicans, which is to say, feral).

A bill to give same-sex couples equal treatment in retirement benefits was delayed at least until September, when a whole raft of other equality legislation will also be up for scrutiny.

Fundamentalist Christians and Muslims have been in lockstep in their opposition to same-sex marriage so far. Could this be a crack in the wall?

Now we suddenly have Christians and Muslims at loggerheads over the definition of marriage in our multicultural society.

Because one of the reasons Christians always give for opposing same-sex marriage is that it will lead to polygamy, polyandry (one wife / many husbands), group marriage and so forth.

Could this be an opportunity for the gay community to make common cause with the Muslim community against the Christians, for general reform of the marriage laws?

Sheerest fantasy, of course. I can’t see Muslims supporting same-sex marriage any time soon, and I can’t see gay communities supporting polygamy – at least, not in public. But at the same time, given the way many gay and bisexual relationships are structured in reality, I can’t see why not.

And it does neatly expose the limits of mutliculturalism. "We're not really a multicultural society in that sense," said James Jupp, of the Australian National University. "We privilege one culture, the Western Christian culture, over all others."
65
Vote
   


Tasmania, devil
Tasmanian devil - he bites!

The devil's in the details, as Tasmania moves to legalise same-sex marriage.

[ Click here to read more ]
63
Vote
   


Doug Pollard's Blogs

9698 Vote(s)
115 Comment(s)
141 Post(s)
Moderated by Doug Pollard
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]